The law office of Clark & Clark reported on Monday that a not blameworthy decision was conveyed by a jury in the passing via auto instance of Bryant Almanzar of Secaucus, New Jersey. Almanzar was accused of death via auto, DWI and opposing capture after his auto lethally struck a walker in February 2015.
Accomplice lawyers Ryan Clark and Michael Noonan of Clark & Clark shielded Almanzar at trial.
“We are extremely satisfied with this decision, as is Mr. Almanzar,” Clark said. “We feel that the jury understood this was a deplorable mischance that happened and was not vehicular manslaughter.”
The trial started on Nov. 1. Noonan said in his opening explanation that frigid conditions made Almanzar lose control of his auto – a reality validated by Almanzar’s fiancee, who was a traveler in the vehicle at the season of the mischance.
The arraignment endeavored to contend that Almanzar was driving while inebriated when his vehicle struck the person on foot. Notwithstanding, a blood test demonstrated that the respondent’s blood liquor substance was .036 – not in any case half of as far as possible.
Clark and Noonan likewise exhibited declaration repudiating the discoveries of the state’s mishap examination, which reasoned that Almanzar was going at twofold as far as possible on Region Road in Secaucus when the crash happened. A specialist who showed up for Almanzar’s sake said that there was no real way to decide convincingly the speed at which the litigant’s vehicle was voyaging.
Almanzar confronted 5 to 10 years in jail if indicted demise via auto. Noonan said that the case is characteristic of the significance of acquiring experienced guidance when confronting criminal allegations.
About Clark & Clark, LLC
Previous New Jersey prosecutors Charles F. Clark and Ryan J. Clark now speak to respondents in cases before government, state and city courts. Accomplice lawyer Michael S. Noonan rehearses criminal protection and common law, speaking to offended parties in auto collision, slip-and-fall, wrongful passing and other individual harm claims.